Whooping Cough Vaccine

Whooping cough outbreak affected only vaccinated students

The pertussis vaccine has been controversial since its creation in 1912. The book DPT: A Shot in the Dark by Coulter & Fisher was published by Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, documenting scientific evidence for DPT vaccine-induced brain and immune system dysfunction and included more than 100 new original case histories. The book would eventually be used by the Institute of Medicine as a reference for its 1991 report “Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines,” which confirmed a causal relationship between DPT vaccine and acute encephalopathy.

Non vaccinated children were pointed out as the cause of a recent whooping cough outbreak in upscale Cap Cod, Massachusetts, according to state health authorities. However CBS Boston reported that all of the children affected by the outbreak had been previously vaccinated, a circumstance that again highlights the fact that vaccines simply do not work as advertised.

At least 15 children at Falmouth High School reportedly came down with the respiratory illness, which also goes by the name pertussis, sparking a wave of panic about a corresponding increase in vaccine exemptions. But as usual, nobody affected by the outbreak was unvaccinated, and no matter how hard the media tries to spin the issue, those who were vaccinated were not protected.

Mainstream media obscures the issue of vaccinations and exemptions

Reporting for CBS Boston, I-Team correspondent Lauren Leamanczyk towed the pro-vaccine line with accusations that vaccine exemptions triggered the outbreak. Undisclosed data she apparently found reveals that vaccine exemptions have increased fourfold over the past 25 years, which public health officials say increases the risk of an outbreak.

This supposed correlation proves nothing, of course, as correlation does not imply causation. But when vaccines are involved, any deviation from the standard vaccine protocol, which is basically to take whatever the government says is good for you, becomes the automatic scapegoat when an outbreak occurs.

In her story, Leamanczyk quotes the words of Dr. Sharon Daly, Chief of Pediatrics at Cape Cod Hospital, who declares that outbreaks increase when vaccination rates decrease. The implication, naturally, is that the Falmouth outbreak was triggered by unvaccinated children.

But a few paragraphs later, Leamanczyk fesses up to the fact that all of the affected children who developed whopping cough had previously been vaccinated for it. Based on this fact alone, it is clear that whooping cough vaccines don’t work, as every child who had been vaccinated should have been protected.

Even if some of the unvaccinated children at the school acted as “carriers” for the disease, a claim often made by pro-vaccine zealots, this only further reinforces that whooping cough vaccines are a failure. If unvaccinated children don’t contract whooping cough while vaccinated children do, then there is no rational basis for continuing the vaccine program.

Philosophical exemptions are not allowed in Massachusetts

Another failure in Leamanczyks article involves the type of exemptions supposedly responsible for the outbreak. She suggests that the rise in philosophical exemptions is the culprit, but Massachusetts doesn’t even allow for philosophical exemptions: only religious and medical exemptions are permitted in the Bay State!

This might seem like a minor discrepancy, but it is the basis of Leamanczyk and the health department’s argument that exemptions are the cause of the outbreak. Perhaps she meant to say medical or religious exemptions, but this major factual error calls into question the entire premise of the article, which nonsensically blames unvaccinated children for spreading disease to vaccinated children.

Vaccines either work or they don’t. Period. Blaming unvaccinated individuals for spreading disease to vaccinated individuals makes no sense, and only further exposes the vaccine agenda for what it is: a complete myth.

Whooping cough vaccines increase disease virulence–Bacterial Drift Mutations

If anything, vaccinated individuals are actually the ones responsible for spreading disease. In the case of whooping cough, a study in the Netherlands found that whooping cough has mutated genetically and become more virulent as a result of whooping cough vaccines, which would explain why outbreaks are escalating.

Another study published in the journal Infection Control Today admits that the vaccine strategy has “not completely eradicated strains of the bacteria,” but rather led to “an increase in diversity,” meaning deadlier strains that are more virulent and perhaps more contagious.

NOTE: As I mentioned in my post on Measles, 68% of those who contracted Whooping Cough in Southern California were in fact vaccinated !!

For more information:

http://boston.cbslocal.com

http://www.nvic.org

http://www.inquisitr.com

Measles Documented Amongst the ‘Fully Immunized’

Measles outbreak documented among the ‘fully immunized’

There was more to the recent measles outbreak than meets the eye.  For starters many years ago in my era and before, if one kid on the block got the measles, every parent took their kids to the “measles house” so their kids would also get them.  It did not seem that many kids died

Recently on HBO’s Vice a story was done on curing cancer using viruses; and the Measles Virus amongst others, was one that was showcased.  There has always been a school of thought about viruses targeting specific cancer cells and not healthy cells. It may not be the final answer but it is certainly unbelievably interesting especially because it is cancer that is up for a possible cure!

Another factor to consider is what is known in medicine as “Viral or Bacterial Drift Mutation”. This is the intuitive phenomenon of a virus or bacteria mutating into something totally different than it originally was in order to protect itself.  This is why the flu vaccine fails along with other vaccinations such as Pertussis and MMR. 68% of those contracting Pertussis in Southern California a year or so ago were vaccinated !

All I am saying is do not let fear which is synonymous with the devil take control of your mind when it comes to Measles or any other vaccination issue.  Study, study, study and come up with your decisions based on truth and not fear.

The latest Disneyland measles outbreak proves that people can go off the rails when their sacred cows are threatened. Corporate toadies from the media went ballistic over a few children, some vaccinated, who allegedly contracted measles at Disneyland because not everyone chooses to vaccinate. One hate-spewing report from a major news outlet actually insisted that parents who oppose vaccinations should be put in jail. However, rational segments of society will recall that many earlier measles outbreaks occurred among fully vaccinated groups of people, laying waste to the official myth that vaccines provide protection against disease.

In 1987, for example, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) documented a measles outbreak that occurred in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985. Fourteen adolescent-age students, all of whom had been vaccinated for measles, contracted the disease despite having been injected with the MMR vaccine. Researchers noted that more than 99 percent of students at the school — basically all of them — had also been vaccinated, with more than 95 percent of them showing detectable antibodies to measles.

This highly revealing study completely contradicts the official narrative being propagated today that unvaccinated individuals are responsible for disease outbreaks like the one that reportedly began at Disneyland. None of the students in Texas who contracted the measles in 1985 were unvaccinated, and virtually none of their peers were unvaccinated. Consequently, so-called “herd immunity,” which would have been activated based on what health authorities claim as indisputable immunological fact, was also shown to be an unsubstantiated myth, further vindicating the unvaccinated as a possible cause of this particular outbreak. There’s no other valid explanation for why a fully vaccinated group of children, who were surrounded by an almost fully vaccinated group of peers, contracted a disease for which they should have been immune, according to the official story. And there’s no blaming the one or two students who weren’t vaccinated for this outbreak because:

1) not a single unvaccinated student contracted the measles; and
2) herd immunity would have been activated regardless, supposedly protecting everyone.

CDC data published after 1985 reveals exceptional failure of MMR vaccine

Additionally, those who were vaccinated should have been protected by the vaccine either way — that is, if vaccines really work as claimed. They obviously don’t, which is further evidenced by data later published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).

In a 1988 issue of the report, the CDC published data on measles which documented 3,655 cases of measles in 1987, the previous year. Guess how many of these cases were in vaccinated individuals? 1,903, or roughly 52 percent — more than half! So much for the effectiveness of that MMR vaccine that health authorities want you and your family to rush out and get immediately.

MMR is the same vaccine that was exposed by the CDC whistle-blower as causing autism, particularly in young African American boys. And because MMR contains attenuated (weakened) live measles virus, it can also shed from vaccinated individuals to others, which may have been behind past measles outbreaks.

There are number of possible factors here that the media is ignoring in its vicious witch hunt to demonize all those “anti-vaxxers” out there who have legitimate concerns about the safety and effectiveness of this controversial vaccine. But don’t let them bully you — it is ultimately your decision to decide what’s best for your children, even if it means foregoing what the establishment claims is the solution.

For more information:

http://www.cdc.gov

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

http://www.naturalnews.com